Kostenlose Energie von der Sonne. Das stimmt, aber nur zur Hälfte. Denn um die kostenlose solare Energie einzufangen, braucht man Solarpanele – und natürlich reichlich Raum um diese aufzustellen. Ungenutzte Dächer bieten sich dazu an. Allerdings werden Solaranlagen zunehmend auf fruchtbarem Ackerland und anderen hochwertigen Flächen aufgestellt. Die Subventionspolitik treibt seltsam Blüten. Es soll sogar einige Solarfarmer geben, die ihre Zellen nachts mit Strom aus der Steckdose bescheinen, um den subventionierten “Solarstrom” auch nachts zu Höchstpreisen einzuspeisen.
Wo viel Geld im Spiel ist, dort gibt es Lobbyisten. Skeptiker werden kurzerhand kaltgestellt, entweder durch persönliche Attacken oder Fördermittelentzug. Das Carolina Journal berichtete am 25. Juli 2017 über einen krassen Fall des SolarLobby-Mobbings:
N.C. State researchers say solar lobby silencing them
Heiniger and Eckerlin removed from government-sponsored forums when they questioned effects of large solar facilities on farmland
Ron Heiniger just wanted to be a farmer. He encouraged research to avoid solar industry encroachment on North Carolina’s prime farmlands. But because of his academic study, the respected crop and soil scientist has become an unwilling poster child for anti-solar activists, vilified by the solar lobby, and chastened by his employer, N.C. State University. “I’ve been called crazy. I’ve been threatened. My job’s been threatened. I really don’t want to advertise my issue very much anymore,” said Heiniger, who works at the Vernon G. James Research and Extension Center in Plymouth.
Weiterlesen im Carolina Journal
Halten die Solarpanele eigentlich ewig? Antwort: Nein! Mittel- bis langfristig droht uns daher eine riesige Solarmüll-Lawine zu erschlagen, wie The Energy Collective am 28. Juni 2017 zu bedenken gab:
Are We Headed for a Solar Waste Crisis?
Last November, Japan’s Environment Ministry issued a stark warning: the amount of solar panel waste Japan produces every year will rise from 10,000 to 800,000 tons by 2040, and the nation has no plan for safely disposing of it. Neither does California, a world leader in deploying solar panels. Only Europe requires solar panel makers to collect and dispose of solar waste at the end of their lives. All of which begs the question: just how big of a problem is solar waste? Environmental Progress investigated the problem to see how the problem compared to the much more high-profile issue of nuclear waste. We found:
- Solar panels create 300 times more toxic waste per unit of energy than do nuclear power plants.
- If solar and nuclear produce the same amount of electricity over the next 25 years that nuclear produced in 2016, and the wastes are stacked on football fields, the nuclear waste would reach the height of the Leaning Tower of Pisa (52 meters), while the solar waste would reach the height of two Mt. Everests (16 km).
- In countries like China, India, and Ghana, communities living near e-waste dumps often burn the waste in order to salvage the valuable copper wires for resale. Since this process requires burning off the plastic, the resulting smoke contains toxic fumes that are carcinogenic and teratogenic (birth defect-causing) when inhaled.
Weiterlesen auf The Energy Collective
Solaranlagen rentieren sich vor allem in warmen, heißen Gebieten, z.B. in Wüsten bzw. wüstenartigen Gegenden. Genau dort gibt es aber auch schlimme Staubstürme. Der Staub lagert sich auch auf den Solaranlagen ab. Duke University konnte nun in einer Studie zeigen, dass die Staubverunreinigungen in manchen Gegenden der Erde die elektrische Ausbeute der Solaranlagen um zum Teil mehr als 25% herabsetzen:
Air Pollution Casts Shadow over Solar Energy Production
First study of its kind shows airborne particles and their accumulation on solar cells is cutting energy output by more than 25 percent in certain parts of the world. Global solar energy production is taking a major hit due to air pollution and dust.
According to a new study, airborne particles and their accumulation on solar cells are cutting energy output by more than 25 percent in certain parts of the world. The regions hardest hit are also those investing the most in solar energy installations: China, India and the Arabian Peninsula. The study appears online June 23 in Environmental Science & Technology Letters. “My colleagues in India were showing off some of their rooftop solar installations, and I was blown away by how dirty the panels were,” said Michael Bergin, professor of civil and environmental engineering at Duke University and lead author of the study. “I thought the dirt had to affect their efficiencies, but there weren’t any studies out there estimating the losses. So we put together a comprehensive model to do just that.”
With colleagues at the Indian Institute of Technology-Gandhinagar and the University of Wisconsin at Madison, Bergin measured the decrease in solar energy gathered by the IITGN’s solar panels as they became dirtier over time. The data showed a 50-percent jump in efficiency each time the panels were cleaned after being left alone for several weeks. The researchers also sampled the grime to analyze its composition, revealing that 92 percent was dust while the remaining fraction was composed of carbon and ion pollutants from human activity. While this may sound like a small amount, light is blocked more efficiently by smaller man-made particles than by natural dust. As a result, the human contributions to energy loss are much greater than those from dust, making the two sources roughly equal antagonists in this case.
“The manmade particles are also small and sticky, making them much more difficult to clean off,” said Bergin. “You might think you could just clean the solar panels more often, but the more you clean them, the higher your risk of damaging them.” Having previously analyzed pollutants discoloring India’s Taj Mahal, Bergin already had a good idea of how these different particles react to sunlight. Using his earlier work as a base, he created an equation that accurately estimates the amount of sunlight blocked by different compositions of solar panel dust and pollution buildup. But grimy buildup on solar panels isn’t the only thing blocking sunlight—the ambient particles in the air also have a screening effect. For that half of the sun-blocking equation, Bergin turned to Drew Shindell, professor of climate sciences at Duke and an expert in using the NASA GISS Global Climate Model.
Because the climate model already accounts for the amount of the sun’s energy blocked by different types of airborne particles, it was not a stretch to estimate the particles’ effects on solar energy. The NASA model also estimates the amount of particulate matter deposited on surfaces worldwide, providing a basis for Bergin’s equation to calculate how much sunlight would be blocked by accumulated dust and pollution. The resulting calculations estimate the total loss of solar energy production in every part of the world. While the United States has relatively little migratory dust, more arid regions such as the Arabian Peninsula, Northern India and Eastern China are looking at heavy losses — 17 to 25 percent or more, assuming monthly cleanings. If cleanings take place every two months, those numbers jump to 25 or 35 percent.
There are, of course, multiple variables that affect solar power production both on a local and regional level. For example, a large construction zone can cause a swift buildup of dust on a nearby solar array. The Arabian Peninsula loses much more solar power to dust than it does manmade pollutants, Bergin said. But the reverse is true for regions of China, and regions of India are not far behind. “China is already looking at tens of billions of dollars being lost each year, with more than 80 percent of that coming from losses due to pollution,” said Bergin. “With the explosion of renewables taking place in China and their recent commitment to expanding their solar power capacity, that number is only going to go up.” “We always knew these pollutants were bad for human health and climate change, but now we’ve shown how bad they are for solar energy as well,” continued Bergin. “It’s yet another reason for policymakers worldwide to adopt emissions controls.” This work was supported by the US Agency for International Development and the Office of the Vice Provost for Research at Duke University.
“Large reductions in solar energy production due to dust and particulate air pollution,” Mike Bergin, Chinmay Ghoroi, Deepa Dixit, Jamie Schauer, Drew Shindell. Environmental Science & Technology Letters, June 26, 2017. DOI: 10.1021/acs.estlett.7b00197
Zum Abschluss wieder eine gute Nachricht. Die FAZ berichtete am 21. Juni 2017 über frische Ideen in der Energiespeicherung:
Friesische Salzkavernen werden zu Batterien
Die Achillesferse der Energiewende sind fehlende Stromspeicher. Doch in Ostfriesland hat man nun eine Lösung gefunden. Dort soll „die größte Batterie der Welt“ entstehen.
Weiterlesen in der FAZ